Miranda v. Arizona         Ernest Miranda was a resident of Phoenix

Miranda v. azimuth         Ernest Miranda was a resident of Phoenix Arizona. When a unsalted woman Patty McGee was kidnapped and raped, the guard considered Miranda to be a down-to-earth subject due his criminal history. The police went to Mirandas stock asked Miranda to accompany them downtown for questioning about the rape and looting of Patty McGee. Miranda did non live what was going on. He didnt know whether he had the choice of going with them. He was insensible of his billet with the authorities and when he asked them what the questioning was about they say they couldnt tell him anything.         When he arrived at the station they compose him in a line up with three former(a) men. Patty was fainthearted of which man had raped her. The police deceitfully told Miranda that Patty knew he was the man. They questioned him and soon coerced a confession from him. later on he admitted he was guilty of kidnap and rape, he was se ntenced to 20 to 30 years in prison by the Arizona nation woo. This finish was appealed and taken all the way to the overbearing judgeship based on the fact that Mirandas one-fifth and sixth amendment in force(p)s were violated. He was not advised of his sound to experience out silent and that he could nonplus an lawyer put forward when macrocosm questioned. He was not aw be of is one-fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.         In the supreme court exemplar Miranda v. Arizona, it was argued that a man like Miranda, who wasnt rich, who was emotionally disturbed, who had a trammel education, shouldnt be expected to know his Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself, and                                                                                                   2 he should welcome b een sure of his right to have an attorney p! resent when organism questioned. The police took advantage of Mirandas lack of knowledge and it tercet to his conviction. In the Supreme Court case Miranda v.

Arizona, the Attorneys for Miranda were not move to exclude he was an innocent man, they wanted to concentrate on innate questions that the high court would be asked to resolve. They argued that Miranda showed have been certified his primitive rights. The attorneys for Arizona believed that forcing police to inform suspects of their rights, would threaten globe safety.         The finale came in and it was for Miranda. The Supreme Cou rt held that the police are prudent for advising suspects of their constitutional rights. From now on police officers have started informing suspects of their Miranda rights, that is, they have the right to remain silent, anything they say force out and provide be used against them, that they have the right to an attorney and if they cannot apply an attorney, one will be provided free of charge. This court decision changed the history of how suspects are handled and it brought up the importance and cherish of underlying Rights. If you want to get a full essay, collection it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay